Stop targeting personas. You are marketing to one person. The deal is being decided by eight. That gap between the contact you know and the committee you don't is where pipeline stalls, win rates disappoint, and deals go quiet without explanation. Persona-based targeting was not built for this buying environment. The sooner you stop optimizing for individuals and start building coverage across the full buying group, the sooner your numbers will start moving.
Most B2B deals are decided before sales ever get a meeting. If you are influencing one contact, you are not in the deal.
The average B2B buying group includes 6 to 10 stakeholders across functions like IT, finance, procurement, and operations.¹
Your “champion” rarely controls the outcome. They influence it. The decision is made collectively.
Teams that align sales and marketing to engage the right members of the buying group achieve 2 to 3 times higher win rates.²
Buyers also complete most of their journey before engaging with sales, and the preferred vendor at that stage wins the majority of deals.³
If you are not engaging the full group early, you are competing from behind.
Personas are useful for messaging. They fail as a targeting strategy.
They assume one decision-maker
Real deals involve multiple roles with different priorities. A CISO cares about risk. Finance cares about cost. Engineering cares about implementation. No single persona can represent all of them.
They optimize for contacts, not accounts
One engaged lead does not indicate buying intent. Multiple stakeholders engaging in the same account at the same time do.
They ignore blockers
Legal, procurement, and finance often determine whether deals move forward. They are rarely included in persona strategies. They can stop deals completely.
Every deal typically includes five core roles:
Your job is not to generate a lead. It is to build coverage across these roles within target accounts.
Start with your ICP. Then map the roles involved in your category.
Example for a security platform:
Then assess coverage:
Marketing and Sales often work on different versions of the same account.
Fix this by agreeing on:
When both teams work with the same definition, pipeline quality improves.
Individual intent signals are weak. Group-level signals are strong.
Look for:
This is the difference between passive interest and active buying.
Most programs reach one or two contacts. That is not enough.
You need:
Buyers spend limited time with vendors, and that time is split across multiple providers.¹
If parts of the buying group are not hearing from you, they are hearing from someone else.
You do not need a new strategy. You need to add metrics for buying groups.
Start Measuring:
The goal is to achieve full coverage of the buying group in the right accounts.
Buying group targeting fails without accurate data.
If contacts are missing, outdated, or misaligned, your coverage is incomplete. That leads to false signals, blind spots in key accounts, and deals that stall before sales ever know why.
DemandSkill helps teams:
Most programs fail at the data layer before they ever fail at the strategy layer. Clean data is not a nice-to-have. It is the foundation that makes everything else work.
The teams that win are not the ones with the best personas. They have the best buying group coverage.
Clean data. Clear intent. Predictable pipeline. Identify and engage your full buying group to scale your pipeline.
References
Gartner – Future of Sales: Why B2B Sales Needs a Digital-First Approach https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2020-09-15-gartner-says-80--of-b2b-sales-interactions-between-su
Demandbase – Buying Groups: The Key to Higher Win Rates https://www.demandbase.com/resources/labs/b2b-buying-groups-drive-revenue/
6sense – The B2B Buyer Experience Report 2025 https://6sense.com/science-of-b2b/buyer-experience-report-2025/